Now, read discussion between the P320 & P226 pistols in this very article so that you can easily identify the one that suits your need better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SIG P226 Vs. SIG P320: Quick Comparison Table<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Let\u2019s check out the difference between these two guns through their specs-<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Let\u2019s check out the difference between these guns through their specs-<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The SIG P226 is a metal-framed, hammer-fired, double-action pistol<\/strong>. It is designed with non-modular internals<\/strong> and you will not be able to interchange its frame, slide, barrel, or other major components<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the contrary, if you check the SIG P320 pistol’s design and available features, you will notice that it is a full-size polymer-framed hammerless striker-fired pistol<\/strong>. The P320 is designed with a Modular fire control unit which means you can purchase a new slide, barrel, or frame to turn it into a compact carry pistol because this gun lets you interchange (the serial number must match with the replacing part) its factory-assembled major components<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, if you compare these two’s manufacturing designs and features, you will see the obvious differences between them. Both are designed incredibly and ensure excellent reliability, but the SIG P320 is a newer version and offers more options in terms of interchangeability. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The SIG P226 is designed and built with a significantly higher ratio of metal and it makes the gun quite heavier than the P320 gun<\/strong>. Not only that but the P226 also has only a 15+1 magazine capacity<\/strong> which is less than the P320. But the P226 is not as chunky as the P320 and is thinner than the P320 version<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the other hand, the SIG P320 is a polymer-based (polymer-made frames) gun, but the main components, such as the slide, springs, and barrel are made of metal<\/strong>. That means it has a significantly less percentage of metal and is lighter than the P226<\/strong>. Also, the SIG P320 has a bigger mag capacity of 17+1<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, if you are looking for a heavier but thin pistol with a decent mag capacity, P226 is better. But if you are interested in lighter and need a higher mag capacity, the P320 will be better for you.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The SIG P226 pistol can either be a single-action\/double-action (SA\/DA) or a single-action only (SAO) configuration<\/strong>. Besides that, it also features Legion configuration (<\/strong>which means the gun contains an upgraded trigger, grips, sites, and tuning<\/em>)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the other hand, the SIG P320 pistol’s trigger pulls generally stay somewhere between the single-action or double-action (SA\/DA)<\/strong> and is a cheaper version especially because of the Polymer<\/strong>. Also, it does not have an upgraded legion model<\/strong>, but users can enjoy the advantage of the Modular system<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you desire Legion configuration over modularity, then the P226 is a better choice, but if you prefer modularity, go for the P320.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n It is really impossible to pick one between these two based on which one is better than the other concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because both pistols are designed with upgraded and improvised features like optics-ready configurations, which means both are equally reliable. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, it solely depends on the users’ preference to claim one over another as “the better option”.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Some users might prefer polymer-framed, striker-fired pistols<\/strong> and the P320 will become a better choice for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another thing is, the P226 absorbs the recoil better than the P320 because it is more solid than the P320.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n On the contrary, the P320 offers more flexibility and allows customizing the gun based on your preferences.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Other users might like a gun with a higher percentage of metal and feels a little heavier<\/strong> the P226 is the ideal option for those consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Similarly, some people prefer having a DA\/SA system<\/a> on their handguns and the P226 will be better for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While considering the price difference between these two, the <\/em>SIG P226<\/em><\/a> is more expensive than the <\/em>SIG P320<\/em><\/a>, and if you are interested in a more affordable gun, the P320 is better.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n You might also consider how upgraded and improvised each of these pistols is because they both have some individual benefits that are missing in the other.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSpecifications<\/strong><\/td> SIG P226<\/strong><\/td> SIG P320<\/strong><\/td><\/tr> Overall Length<\/strong><\/td> 7.7 inches<\/td> 8 inches<\/td><\/tr> Barrel Length<\/strong><\/td> 4.4 inches<\/td> 4.7 inches<\/td><\/tr> Caliber<\/strong><\/td> 9mm<\/td> 9mm<\/td><\/tr> Capacity<\/strong><\/td> 15+1<\/td> 17+1<\/td><\/tr> Stock<\/strong><\/td> E2 Grip<\/td> Polymer Frame<\/td><\/tr> Width<\/strong><\/td> 1.5 inches<\/td> 1.3 inches<\/td><\/tr> Number Of Mags<\/strong><\/td> 2<\/td> 3<\/td><\/tr> Height<\/strong><\/td> 5.5 inches<\/td> 5.5 inches<\/td><\/tr> Weight<\/strong><\/td> 34 oz.<\/td> 29.6 oz.<\/td><\/tr> Sight<\/strong><\/td> FT: SIGLITE RR: Fixed SIGLITE<\/td> SIGLITE Front\/NS Rear Plate<\/td><\/tr> Finish<\/strong><\/td> Matte Black Nitron<\/td> Coyote<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n ![\"SIG](\"https:\/\/gunanalyst.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/SIG-P226-Vs.-SIG-P320-1024x512.webp\")
What Is the Difference Between SIG P226 and SIG P320 Based on Features?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Feature 1: Modular Fire Control Unit with Interchangeable Frames<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Feature 2: Percentage of Metal and Magazine Capacity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Feature 3: Single-action\/Double-action (SA\/DA) & Legion Configuration<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
SIG P226 or SIG P320 – Which One to Choose?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n